|
.
Degrees
of separation:
This phrase describes the hidden or hard-to-see links between things
that, on the surface appear to be unrelated. Its a word used in science, in psychology, in statistics, and in other
disciplines to describe the way everything is actually connected to and related
with everything else. It's about how things that may seem separate
are actually related. Because the connections are often separated by
intermediary links, the connections are often unseen by the unschooled and
by the casual
observer.
For
Example, those who are the behind-the-scenes controllers of the
multi-billion-dollar drug business are secretly financing or otherwise bringing
good fortune to many of those politicians that favor keeping drugs
illegal. In many instances the degrees of separation are so deep
that even the politicians don't know that some of the money or the good fortune
that show up in their lives had its origin or its inspiration from the drug czars.
Reading
Between the Lines:
This is another concept where the listener/observer is also required to be an
active participant in order to receive the full communication.
"Reading between the lines," means that there is
information in the written statements or spoken words that are not stated directly.
The reader/listener is required to bring his/her mind into the process and pull
up into consciousness the information that is there but, at the same time, is
not openly stated and not obvious to the casual observer. (See the
Examples below.)
.
The
"Degrees
of separation" concept acknowledges that there are intermediary, often unseen, links between
a
starting point and an ending point, between cause and effect, between where you
are and where you want to be. The connections are there, but the
connections are often not obvious.
Finding these relationships can be likened to connecting the dots
in a child's coloring book and then seeing a picture that was not easily visible
prior to connecting the dots.
Some
Examples:
In the 2008 presidential campaign when John
McCain said he supported and approved of the George Bush's Supreme Court
appointees, that was an indirect way to tell the ultra-conservative
religious leaders that he (McCain) favors forced motherhood (opposes
reproductive rights) ) that he is anti-gay rights, and that his political agenda
will be strongly conservative.
The
classic way that this has been demonstrated is to describe the relationship
that human beings have to each other. If you want to contact another human being, no matter who or where he/she may be, you can do so by
contacting someone you already know and asking them to connect you to someone
he/she knows who can connect you to someone he/she knows who can connect you to...
The links
continue for about seven steps. Researches
have concluded that there are, on average, seven intermediary steps between you
and any other person on the planet. With the advent of present day
technology the number of links required appears to be getting
smaller.
Hiding
the Truth:
Cause
and effect relationships follow this same pattern. All of life
follows this pattern. All too often, the actual cause of a problem
is not what you've been led to believe it is. Many politicians and
religious manipulators are masters at hiding these links and/or putting fake
links in the chain to lead the unsuspecting public to a false conclusion.
It's called misinformation or disinformation. Here's an example you
can identify with:
Have
You Noticed
...
The
Value in Your Money:
Have
You Noticed how the price of the goods and services you buy has changed in relation
to the U.S. dollar. Politicians
say the price has gone up. That's a patently false
statement. The truth is that the value of the dollar has gone
down. This
is a rather subtle distinction, but its meanings and implications are phenomenal.
The U.S. dollar is worth less today than it was yesterday so it takes more of
them to equal the value of goods and services you buy. And why has
the value of the dollar gone down. The relationship is straight and
simple, basic, supply-and-demand economics. "If demand stays the same,
an increase in supply results in a decrease in value."
Postage
Stamp Example:
Through
deficit financing, "Resident"
Bush and company have added literally trillions of additional dollars into the
economic system. As a result, you and I are paying more dollars for
the same goods and services. This, for example, is why a three-cent,
first-class, U.S. postage stamp from 1940 has been replaced by a
forty-one-cent
first-class postage stamp in 2007. The mail delivery services that cost
three cents in 1940, cost forty-one
cents dollars, today.
Why? Is the intrinsic
value of delivering a letter today
significantly different than it was
in 1940? No!
Then why does it take almost
fourteen times
as many dollars to buy this same
service today? Because
the value of the dollar had gone
down.
This means
that in relation to the 1940 dollar,
the 2007 dollar has lost almost all of its value.
(92.7% of its former value has
disappeared. 7.3% is all that's left in the 2007
dollar.) The economic ratio may vary slightly, but
the same relationship applies to all other goods and service.
As
another example, the relative values
of a quart of milk and a loaf of
bread are still, today nearly the
same as they were in sixty years
ago. In 1950, I used to
by a quart of milk and a loaf of
bread for nineteen cents each.
Where
Did the Value of Your Money Go?
So,
where has that ninety-tthree percent of the dollar gone? Einstein told
us that physical things don't simply cease to be; they change into energy and/or
re-form and appear as
something else. The lost value has been clandestinely transferred
into the
holdings of the super wealthy. How is it that the richest one-percent of the people
own more wealth than the poorest ninety-percent combined? What is
really behind the Bush and company activities that added more money to the national debt than all other presidents
combined, going back all the way to George Washington? (If you
don't already know how wealth is transferred from the people to the super
wealthy, you are invited to read the page titled: Money
-- Is it Demonic or Divine?°)
Here's
the bottom line: You are being lied to and screwed over by
those who behind the scenes, own the structures that control the United States government.
When those in power can't steal your money directly, they abscond
with it clandestinely by stealing the value out of the money. And
almost nobody notices. Why? Because cause and effect are
distanced by only one, simple, degree of separation. It's called
"inflation." Again readers who don't see the connections are
invited to read the page titled: Money
-- Is it Demonic or Divine?°)
.

.
Reading
Between the Lines:
Take a moment to examine Genesis
3:22-24 in the Christian Bible°
These passages offer a clear, but rather puzzling and
disturbing example of messages that can be found by reading between the
lines.
.

.
Another
example can be found in the words of Saint Paul in Chapter 13 of First Corinthians.
"I may give all my possessions to the poor and surrender my body to be
burned but if I have not love, I gain nothing."
In this statement, the unspoken message that can be deduced by "reading between the
lines," is: The ultimate sacrifice I could make is to
sacrifice my life and be
burned as a gift to God. And that would be a good thing only if I have
love.
What
does this tell us about the mind set (the belief system) of Saint
Paul? In those days, killing
animals and burning their bodies as
a sacrifice to God was a common
practice. There is no evidence
that God desired or required this,
but his activity was engaged in
under the belief that it appeased
the angry fickle superhuman God who
lived above the clouds.
Here's a man whose
access to the teachings of Jesus was
second in connection only the apostles
themselves. He was one of the major contributors to the
Christian theology. And yet, he held a belief that, today, we call
archaic and obsolete.
Because his beliefs would almost
certainly have been typical of men of
his day, what does that say about how the murder of Jesus by the Roman
soldiers was interpreted and presented in the Christian Bible? (See
the section titled: The
Crucifixion / CruiseOfFiction.˛
Would
you consider sacrificing yourself or would you kill one of your children, or a goat, or a
sheep and burning the body as an appeasement to God? Perhaps it's
time to offer an additional perspective on the Christian crucifixion
story. Also see the section titled: The
Ultimate Sacrifice.°
.
|