The Reasonables film Project is about creating a humorous, entertaining, full-length motion picture that supports pro-choice, environment protection, Democrat ideals, personal freedom,  gay rights, lesbian rights, and freedom of religion.    It explains why abortion is a religious freedom issue.   The film deals specifically with unwanted pregnancy, abortion, forced motherhood, and how to keep abortion legal.               :::    ...   

.

Life Coach and Success Coach,  R. Robin Cote',  offers  Professional Life Coaching,  
Personal Life Coaching, Stress Reduction Techniques and Success Coaching
                           for business and professional people.   
 :::    ...       00

Life Coaching   Success Coaching   at   LifeCoach4VIP.com     Visit  our  home  page° 

trp80y   

A Reasonables' New-Vision Project

.

Glossary

.

.

Page Content      

.

   Anthill Analogy`   and   The Ultimate Sacrifice`

   The Beginner's Mind`

   Belief Boxes`  ----------------------------     An invisible prison

.

   Cash Cow`

   Degrees of Separation`

   Ego-Atheist`  

.

   Futile Gesturing`

   Hidden Agenda`    (Hidden Intention)

   Iceberg Principle`

.

   Kaizen`

   Perspective - Point of View`

   Related Web Pages`

   Spin Doctor`

.

.

.

.

Spin Doctor

A spin doctor is a person whose job is to make something or someone look better than he, she, or it is,  or to make an opponent look worse that he or she is.   Spin Doctors commonly distorts the evidence by emphasizing one aspect of it while completely ignoring anything that contradicts the image they are intending to have the public believe.   Those with a political agenda are notorious for peddling spin-doctor distortions of the evidence.

 Lobbyists are spin doctors.   They are  hired by someone who has an agenda to peddle to our legislators.   Unfortunately, they often are parties to legalized bribery, in the form of perks, parties, travel to and being guests at plush foreign resorts, campaign contributions, and the like  to those who vote for their position.   As Will Rogers once said (and its even truer today):   "We have the best politicians that money can buy."

.

.

.

.

Cash Cow

A cash cow is a term used to describe a highly lucrative activity -- a product or business that has an unusually high return (profit margin) .    It's something that brings in a lot of money with relatively time or little effort.    The term is a metaphor for a dairy cow that, once purchased and paid for, can be milked regularly at relatively little cost and minimum maintenance.   

When one examines the activities of the very small, but very determined and very vocal minority of right-wing, ultra-conservative Christian leaders, one finds that they have two very profitable cash cows, both of which are based on illusions, and neither of which have any scientific basis whatsoever.   One is  called  The Rapture°   and the other is their forced motherhood war.   
(Additional Reference: 
The "ABC's of Forced Motherhood)  

Another area filled with cash cows is the multi-billion-dollar, illegal drug industry.    Here's just one example:   Marijuana is a plant that grow wild and can be planted almost anywhere by almost anyone.   The leaves and flowers from this plant sell for more per ounce than gold.  
Reference:  Drugs and the Law 
http://www.truth101.org/vs-drugs-and-the-law.html  

.

.

.

.

Belief Box

A belief box is not a physical box; it's a person's mental mindset,   It controls a person's behavior and dictates his/her level of health.   A belief box is an invisible prison made up of stories that have been accepted by a person as real, true, and factual.   Regardless of whether of not the beliefs represent reality, they are accepted by the subconscious mind as real and the person lives his or her life as if their beliefs actually were real.   In the Christian Bible, when Jesus referred to the  "demons" which He removed via his healing, he was most likely referring to beliefs that limited the person's life.

Think of a belief box as a barrier between the known and the unknown, between the possible and the impossible.   Think of it as a an invisible prison you put yourself in because of a belief.°

The most pervasive (and most destructive)  example revolves around religious beliefs.   There are three widely held, mutually exclusive religious beliefs  (one-life-ism, reincarnation, and atheism)  that dictate the behavior of billions of people. (that's billions with a "B")   Only one of these beliefs can be real which leaves literally  billions of people basing extremely important, life altering, Earth-altering, soul-altering decisions on false beliefs.    Some even commit murder and spread  mayhem in the name of a god about which they can prove absolutely nothing.

When asked why they engage in vile and criminal behavior, the common answer is: "I do as I do because that's what God wants me to do."   The fact that their beliefs are unsupported by the physical evidence doesn't seem to matter to these people.    The fact that their beliefs are contradicted by the beliefs taught to millions in other religions doesn't seem to matter, either.

Every human being has  beliefs that, in one way or another, limits his/her life.  Commonly religious beliefs dominate, control, and sometimes overwhelm the believer's life.   For example, what are the beliefs that compelled the men who hijacked the airplanes that were intentionally crashed into the World Trade Center towers on September 11, 2001?   What are the beliefs that compelled those who murdered doctors and nurses because they provides abortion services?   

For more clarity on belief boxes, readers are refereed to:

Self-created significances°   

Selective Perception° 

A Belief Box as a Prison° 

Have you ever been wrong? °

If you really want to know about thinking outside the box we invite you to the website titled Paul's View - On all kinds of things  at     http://www.paulsview.com/thoughts.htm#Box °   Here's an example of his work.  It's called:

"Thinking Outside the Box"

"I could never understand what people mean when they say, "Think outside the box."   Where's the box?   I didn't know I was in a box.   If I am in a box, how did I get there?   If I'm not in a "the box" how did I get out of it?   Is it my box or someone else's box?   Before you start thinking outside the box it would be a good idea to find out what box you are in."

"From all I know, boxes are meant to put things in.   We are raised from the very beginning to put our toys back in the box.   When we get older we are told to put our tools back in the tool box.   Everything has its box.   The box may be called shelves, or drawers, or cubbyhole, or whatever, but they are still the box in which certain things belong.   It's the old idea that "everything has a place and everything in its place".   Things outside their box are considered to be out of place, making a mess.   Do those who promote thinking outside the box really want us to make a mess with our thoughts, or have messy thoughts?"

"The implication seems to be that the answer will be somewhere "out there." But there is an awful lot of room "outside the box."   So do we start our "outside the box" thinking by looking close to the edges of the outside, sort of in familiar territory, or far away?   And what if I spend all my time looking outside the box and the answers were inside all the time?"

"I think that those who tell you to "think outside the box" are in the box themselves.   What's more, they know the answers are in the box.   They want you to waste all your time thinking outside the box so they will come up with an answer and you will not.   That way they will get the promotion and not you."   

"Now, have I been thinking outside the box, or what?"

.

.

.

.

One-life-ism

One-life-ism is the religious belief that humans life only one life on Earth and then go to heaven, hell, or some other undefined place after death.   This is the basic belief of Christianity.   It's also part of the Islamic belief system.   One could also say atheists believe in one-life-ism.   For a clear distinction between one-life-ism, reincarnation, and atheism, see the page titled: The Three Religious Assumptions in The Book of Timeless Truths and Wisdom®.

.

.

.

.

The Beginner's Mind

The Beginner's mind refers to a process in which a person temporarily suspends his/her beliefs and disbeliefs and simply holds all ideas presented as the working hypotheses.   The Idea is held as neither true or false.

The goal is to open one's  mind and entertain the possibility that there could be more in the universe than one is presently aware of.    This is done  by looking at idea, concepts, thought, and the like that make no sense and neither accepting nor rejecting them.  The process involves just being with the idea, concept, or experience and then becoming aware of how that idea fits or does not fit with the evidence and with one's personal experience.   The holder of the beginner's mind examines the evidence, then goes into his own heart and draws his/her own conclusions.   The  conclusions are then held  not as “The Truth”  but rather as a “ A Most Probable Reality.”   

And, if and when a theory doesn’t prove out, the holder of the beginner's mind doesn’t bother or take the time to tell himself how stupid he was for not seeing it’s flaws sooner.   He simply lets this new knowledge expand his awareness and moves on.   That way a person can change his mind as often as he likes and never get into the self-deprivation mode of call himself wrong.

          Reference:   An Interview With "The Devil", section:

                    56 --  Selective Perception / The Beginner’s mind

.

.

.

.

Degrees of Separation --  Reading Between the Lines:

Has a New Home on page  trp72 --- The Basics About Reality°

.

.

.

.

The Anthill Analogy   and    The Ultimate Sacrifice

Imagine, for a moment, that you have created an ant colony in some far off corner of a distant forest somewhere in the backwaters of nowhere, and you have done so for the express purpose of having those ants build temples in which they bow down and worship you and beg you for favors.  Does that make any sense?    If it does, gather up your money and call me.   I have a bridge in Brookline I'll sell you at a bargain price.

The Origin of Worship:   There is absolutely no evidence what-so-ever to support the belief that the source of the universe either wants,  needs, requires,  to be worshipped by human beings.   The practice of worshipping God is a holdover from ancient times when humans believed that the Earth was flat  like a three-layered cake, with heaven above the clouds and hell beneath their feet.   People in those days believed God was an angry, fickle, vindictive, arbitrary, needy superhuman being sitting on a throne in a place above the clouds called heaven.   

They believed that God was constantly at war with another super-powerful, evil being, who was the evilest of evil, and who controlled a place beneath the earth's surface call hell.   They believed that humans were victims in this war and that God demanded something from humans in order to get into God's heaven.  They weren't sure what god wanted, but if he didn't get it, they, the unfortunate humans who didn't give it to him, would be turned over to the super veil being and burn in hell forever.   They believed that natural disasters were acts of God intentionally punishing humans for not following God's orders.   

Man's knowledge of God:  The scientific evidence, the Christian Bible, and the Muslim Koran all support the following conclusion:   Humans know with provable certainty, absolutely nothing about God except that, what ever it is, it has a profound affect upon us.    Symbolically speaking, man's knowledge of God is comparable to an ant's knowledge of humans.   

Another approach to God:   The evidence seems to indicate that honor, respect, humility, and gratitude are a much more practical ways to relate to Source.   The evidence also indicates that humans  are part of,  intimately related with, and co-creators with that Source we call "God."   One might also consider stewardship of the Sacred mother Earth (caring for the home that has been provided for us)  to be a much more practical and valid approach to Source.   

.

The Ultimate Sacrifice:   Now, think yourself back in time and imagine yourself as a child living in an arid, semi-desert environment where the collection of a few stone and clay huts were considered to be a town and the average home was a tent.   Imagine yourself living among superstitious sheep hearers who believed that the Earth was flat like a three-layered cake with Earth in the middle, God and heaven above, and Satan and hell below.    Imagine your self living among men who considered women as property, and who cut out the clitoris of young females so that as adults they wouldn't desire sex and be unfaithful to their male owners/husbands.     Imagine your self living among men who believed that killing animals and burning them was a way to appease the Gods.   In such a culture, what would be the ultimate sacrifice?   The answer is:  "To kill one of your own children as a sacrifice to God." **1  

**1  As a test of his obedience to God's orders, In Genesis 22:1-2 of the Christian Bible, Abraham, is asked by God to murder his, Abraham's, only son as a sacrifice to God.)

.

In such a culture, who could make the biggest of the biggest sacrifices.   Well, none other than God, Himself.   According to Christian theology, God turned the tables on humanity and murdered his own son as a sacrifice to humanity and to prove that He (God)  loves you.**2 

So now you find yourself and everybody you know indebted to an extremely powerful, all-knowing, ever-present, fickle, angry, insecure, needy, vindictive, vengeful, son-murdering God  who is giving  you orders.  God's orders are coming to you through an old man wearing fancy, expensive clothes, who lives in opulent wealth while you and almost everyone else lives in poverty.   Everyone bows to and respects this revered leader and his agents.   This revered old man sends God's orders out to you by way of  his agent, your local priest, and in addition to the orders, the priest warn you of the dire, eternal-damnation, hell-fire-and-brimstone consequences of doing anything contrary to what you are being told to do.   Even something as simple as questioning a priest's  authority is punishable by banishment from heaven and eternal condemnation to hell.   

Imagine, for a moment, that you are an ignorant, unschooled sheepherder's child who has never seen anything that's more than 30 miles from the place you were born.   Given the above set of circumstances, what would you do?   Would you make waves?   Hardly!   You'd bow down along side everyone else and pray for favors.   

The Cycle Continues:   And if and when you survived to adulthood in that environment, and had children of your own, what would you have taught  them about God?   And what do you suppose they would have taught their children.   In this manner ancient beliefs have been carried along for generations.    Many religious-related beliefs that had their origins in antiquity are still being taught to children today as if those beliefs were provable facts.  Do you suppose it's possible to bring one's mind into religion and look for any evidence that can support beliefs in these ancient stories?  How would the present-day evidence alter these stories?

**2  Did you ever wonder why it's always someone else or someone else's child who is sacrificed or placed in harm's way?   Why is it that those who demand that sacrifices be made or wars be waged never stand up and say, "Sacrifice me."  or "I'll go. you stay here and tend to home life."?

.

.

.

.

Ego-Atheist.

A detailed description of an ego-atheists (as distinct from the humanitarian atheists)°  can be found at:   http://www.pro-truth.net/70b-recognizing-evil.html#EgoAtheist.°   

.

.

.

.

Futile Gesturing

Futile gesturing is taking an action that one knows will not produce the desires result, but taking that action anyway.   Although one knows that the action is a waste of time and energy, that knowing may be hidden in denial of what the evidence says about the topic.   Futile gesturing is an act done in desperation,  out of illusion, or it may be a deceptive way of accomplishing a hidden agenda.    Futile gesturing is also used as a way of justifying failure.   

Treating symptoms and ignoring the problem is the most common form of futile gesturing.    It's common for politicians to propose solutions that won't get society where they claim they want it to be.   

Insanity:  The U.S. anti-drug war and the anti-terrorist war are both extremely costly and extremely ineffective activities, neither of which is going to solve the problem they claim to be addressing.   Both are futile gesturing.   Both are insane.   Einstein gave us the classic definition of insanity,  "Taking the same action over and over again [and] expecting a different result."   

Hidden Agenda:   Another aspect to consider is that what appears to The Reasonables as a act of futile gesturing may be  ( for the person or group taking that action or actions)  an intention activity designed to fulfill a hidden agenda.    The ultra-conservative Christian anti-abortion war is the perfect example of a hidden agenda.   The anti-abortion war also fits the definitions of both insanity and futile gesturing.   For a more detailed analysis of this example, see the page titled: Hidden Agenda.°   on out pro-truth website.

.

.

.

.

Hidden Agenda

To have a hidden agenda is to conceal one's true intentions behind a facade of something else.   It's hypocrisy in actions.   It's saying one thing and quietly or even secretly doing something else.   It's another way of lying by withholding the truth.°   Although such behavior is legal, it's morally and ethically  bankrupt. 

.

.

Here's an Example of a Hidden Agenda

Editors note:  If you become emotionally upset at the example below we invite you to take the Truth Challenge.°   Show us exactly and specifically where any statement below is wrong or inaccurate.  

The forced motherhood leaders offer us an excellent example of a hidden agenda.   They claim that their intention is to save the lives of innocent babies.   If that really is their true intention, then we wonder  why  they ignore the 40,000 already-born children who starve to death every day°  or die of curable diseases?    We wonder why are they badger people and demand egg rights while allowing 40,000 innocent children to die every day?  WHY?  Because they have a hidden agenda and that agenda is not about saving babies.   

The  true intention of the ultra-conservative Christian hierarchy is political domination. °  Their true intention is to create a Christian Theocracy in America ° with themselves in charge.

Then why are they so vehemently promoting forced motherhood?   
M  O  N  E  Y !   Because pretending to be concerned about saving babies  is a highly effective advertising  tool.    The abortion controversy is the ultimate mind bending tool because it combines the worlds three most powerful emotional triggers --  sex, motherhood, and babies.     It's actually a 
multi-billion dollar cash cow.°  --  a tool for raising billions of dollars.   The abortion controversy also generates  multi-millions of dollars worth of free publicity that they use to sway public opinion.    The abortion controversy is a ticket to political power.

Without the abortion controversy,  they would have to find another way to stroke their egos and appease their guilt.   Without the abortion controversy,  they would each be just one more minister among the thousands presently struggling to find enough  money to support their churches.

Why Not simply be honest?   Because the entire forced motherhood campaign is base on unprovable religious beliefs. °    Because it denies the Bible.°   Because it's based on a religious fairytale that comes to us from antiquity, from men who believed the Earth was flat. °    Because the forced motherhood story cannot stand the light of open honest questioning. ° 

Not Everyone:   Please be clear that we are not painting all Christians with the same brush.  Some Christian groups are doing phenomenally constructive and productive work in this area.   Our focus in on the highly vocal, ultra-conservative, Christian hierarchy who are willing to ignore the evidence, deny the Bible, subvert the Constitution, be the worlds most blatant hypocrites, and  force unwilling women to bear unwanted children in an already overcrowded world.  

True intention:   You can easily see someone's true intentions in three major ways:   1) by noting the company they keep, 2)  by watching what activities they engages in and 3)  by being aware of what actually happens.   In this example:  The intention of the forced motherhood leaders is to ignore starving babies.   Why do I say that?  Because  the evidence tells us that that's exactly what they're doing.     

How can any group with millions of dollars to spend claim to be saving babies and at the same time ignore the 40,000 already born children who starve to death ° each and every day or die from curable diseases?   Not only that, by way of their anti-abortion gag rule, °  by their other activities, °  and by what they condone and support, °  they force many mothers with starving children to produce still more unwanted babies.

Their true intention, their real agenda, revolves around  ego, money, power, fame, and political control.   They don't really care about saving innocent lives because their true intention is to  hijack (to take over and dominate) the Republican party.   While claiming to be saving babies, they are spending millions of baby-saving dollars dollars promoting ultra-conservative Republican candidates for political office.   Why?  Because those candidates support their political intention.  They are anti-abortion, anti-sex, anti-gay rights, anti-embryonic-stem-cell research, and  anti-almost anything pleasurable.   The candidates they support are part of the team working to  create a Christian theocracy in America.

Exposing their hidden agenda reveals a cesspool  of Hypocrisy. °     The forced motherhood promoters may be pro-embryo, but they certainly are NOT pro-life.

Links to closely related pages:  

The No-Choice Leaders and Hypocrisy ° 

God's Conception Magic Act  ° 

Have you ever been wrong? ° 

What is Life? ° 

Life Begins When? ° 

God's Cosmic Trash Bin ° 

.

.

.

.

  The Iceberg Principle:

An iceberg is only twenty percent above water and the underwater part is invisible to the casual observer.    When you find that a so-called public servant (someone in a position of power and/or authority)  has been taping the public treasury, running scams, playing dirty tricks or pulling off other shenanigans,  you can bet that what you find out about is only a small fraction of what he's been doing.   

To see this principle in an action context, readers are directed to the page titled:  Sex, Sin, and Saint Anti-sexual  Augustine.°   

.

.

.

.

Kaizen  --  How to Eat an Elephant

All actions in physical space happen in time and in a sequential fashion.   Everything is a process.***   By becoming aware of how this sequential process works, you can consciously and intentionally align your personal behavior with the way the physical universe functions to improve your life.   This is what Kaizen is all about.

Kaizen is a continuing series of small, positive changes made with the intention of improving the quality, joy, and comfort in any area of one’s life.   Kaizen is a series of small steps; as distinct from constant change and as distinct from innovation, which is making a large, major change in the shortest possible time.   

***   Even when things appear to happen instantly, it's still a sequential process.   Some events occur so fast,  that 
without technical aids such as high speed cameras,  we 
cannot perceive the progression as it occurs.   We see 
only the results.

We've  been programmed to believe the change comes in big and major pieces.  This is called "Innovation."   The only problem with innovation is that it's too big to cope with,  it  usually doesn't work,  and it's scary as hell.    Kaizen offers a way around this and several other problems.

The human psyche is designed to resist change.   Most of us like routine; we like the normal, the dependable, that which is in harmony with us.   So when facing major changes we baulk, we resist, and all to often, simply refuse to change.   The result of refusing to adjust or or adapt to the new context is often uncomfortable, painful, and could even produce disaster.   Kaizen offers a way around this problem, too.   

Fear of failure is still another major factor in our inability to make major changes.   In many social traditions, particularly, the Christian tradition there is a strong psychological link between being wrong and being punished.  Failure is associated with pain.   The way around this is again found in the Kaizen approach.   Make steps so small that success is relatively easy.   

Instead of major changes, use the mountain-climbers motto:   "Take one step at a time."   Or answer the ancient Sufi masters question:  "How do you eat an elephant?"   We don’t actually eat elephants, but symbolically speaking the answer is “One bite at a time.”   Some additional examples:   

   In whatever goals you're striving to reach, think in terms that you're familiar and comfortable with.    Now stretch one small step beyond what is easy for you to do.    Avoid a big jump.   Just take a small step.   Tomorrow, perhaps you'll  be ready for two steps.

   You probably won't be able to lose thirty pounds, but you could lose one or two pounds.   Then after that, you could probably lose another pound or two.   

   You could postpone the next cigarette or the next drink or the second helping of food for ten minutes.   And after ten minutes, you might consider postponing them another  five minutes.    Later, you could begin by postponing them for fifteen minutes, and so on.   

   Think of a small way you could improve the efficiency of your work or your tasks at home.   

   You'll probably resist cleaning your whole house, but  you could easily clean one shelf in the pantry.   Then later, or  tomorrow or the day after, you might tackle a second shelf.  

   How could you be just a bit nicer to your family, friends, co-workers, and the people you encounter in the grocery market or a restaurant? 

   And the words you just read. . .   They were typed one letter at a time.

It’s much easier, psychologically, emotionally and physically, to make a series of a thousand small steps than it is to make one huge jump.   The  N.V.P. Team  utilizes this one-bite-at-a-time approach to re-creating our lives.   

.

Recommended reading no this topic:    
One Small Step Can Change Your Life: